credit : Washington University in St. Louis
Body size isn’t the only factor that determines whether an animal can keep warm in the cold
Newly compiled physiological data lets biologists test old ideas about thermoregulation
Animals adapt to thermal environments by changing metabolic rate and ‘insulation,’ not body size as once thought
How do birds and mammals maintain near-constant body temperatures as the environmental temperature fluctuates, sometimes widly?
The model for thermoregulation biologists use is dervied from the work of Laurence Irving and Per Scholander with artic animals and birds in the 1950s.
To stay comfortable, the Scholander-Irving model says, warm-blooded birds and mammals must balance their metabolic heat production with their heat loss to the environment.
Since body size affects both rates, biologists have long speculated larger animals are better adapted to colder environments, and smaller ones to warmer ones.
But when a group of scientists at the University of New Mexico looked at the geographic ranges of 6,356 species of birds and 2,648 species of mammals, they found that birds and mammals of nearly every size live basically everywhere.
If they’re not changing size, how do species adapt to different environmental temperature ranges?
The scientists were able to use newly compiled physiological data to show that they adapt their metabolic rate and their “thermal conductance.” Changes in body size play only a minor role.
The study, published Dec. 14, 2015, in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, is the work of three graduate students in the labs of James H. Brown, PhD, and Felisa Smith, PhD, at the University of New Mexico. The lead author is Trevor Fristoe, PhD, now a postdoctoral research associate in biology in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis.
Baby, it’s hot outside
“We were interested in understanding ways other than body size that species can adapt their physiology and morphology in order to deal with environmental temperatures,” Fristoe said.
“So we developed a method of measuring adaptation to the thermal environment independent of body size. We incorporated changes in both the rate of heat production via a species’ metabolism as well as thermal conductance — the loss of bodily heat to the environment.”
A fox, for example, has a higher basal metabolic rate than a sloth.
Thermal conductance is affected by insulation such as thick fur, or body parts such as big ears or long legs that can help to dissipate heat.
To test their model, the scientists collaborated with Imran Khaliq of Ghazi University in Pakistan, and Christian Hof of the Senckenberg Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre in Frankfurt, Germany, who had compiled data on thermal physiology for hundreds of species of birds and mammals.
“Our ideas build on the Scholander-Irving model of heat transfer, which has been around for over 60 years,” Fristoe said. “However, it has only become recently possible to test these types of questions at such a large scale because of the growing availability of physiological data.”
Comparing physiological and environmental temperature data for 211 bird and 178 mammal species, the scientists demonstrated that birds and mammals have adapted to geographic variation in environmental temperature by concerted changes in both metabolic heat production and thermal conductance.
Fristoe and colleagues found that species combined these traits in a number of ways.
“It was possible to adapt to cold environments, for example, either by increasing metabolic heat production, decreasing thermal conductance, or both — the interaction between the two is what really mattered,” Fristoe said. “Our study extends a classic model in thermal physiology in order to understand adaptations to temperatures on a global scale.”
“Unraveling these various avenues of adaptation to thermal environments has important implications for understanding how species respond to past, present and future climate change,” he said.
Source : Washington University in St. Louis